Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346258›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

Long-term Outcomes of Traditional Braces versus Invisalign in Orthodontic Treatment.

Seelam Prudhvi Das Reddy, Manjunath Chekka, Ruchi Shah, Afreen Kauser, Manish Pisarla, Praveen Kumar Varma Datla, Akriti Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seelam Prudhvi Das ReddyDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Private Dental Practitioner, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Manjunath ChekkaProfessor and HOD, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Tirumala Dental College, Bardipur, Telangana, India.
Ruchi ShahDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Uvarsad, Gujarat, India.
Afreen KauserMinistry of Health, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Manish PisarlaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Meghana Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Telangana, India.
Praveen Kumar Varma DatlaDepartment of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Akriti MahajanPrivate Consultant, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This research targets to compare the longstanding outcomes of traditional braces versus Invisalign in orthodontic treatment, focusing on dental alignment, occlusal stability, patient satisfaction, and treatment duration. Methods: A retrospective cohort research with 200 subjects was piloted. One hundred subjects received traditional braces, while the other 100 received Invisalign. Dental models, cephalometric radiographs, and intraoral photographs were obtained at baseline, post-treatment, and at 1, 2, and 5 years follow-up. Patient satisfaction surveys were administered at each follow-up visit. Results: Both traditional braces and Invisalign effectively improved dental alignment and occlusal stability over the 5-year follow-up period. Patient satisfaction scores were consistently higher in the Invisalign group compared to the traditional braces group. However, there were no significant differences in treatment duration between the two groups. Conclusion: Invisalign may offer comparable or superior longstanding outcomes compared to traditional braces in orthodontic treatment, with higher patient satisfaction levels. These findings support the use of Invisalign as a viable alternative to traditional braces, particularly for subjects seeking esthetic and convenient orthodontic solutions.

Indexed as

Invisalignlongstanding outcomesorthodontic treatmentpatient satisfactiontraditional braces

Identifiers

PMID39346258
PMCPMC11426896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.