ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
The Effect of Sticky Bone with Concentrated Growth Factor on Bone on Socket Preservation and Delayed Implant Placement: A Case Report of Two Cases.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As they release and enhance numerous areas for regeneration signaling and maintenance, platelets are energy sources with a wealth of growth factors (GFs). To create sticky bone (SB), concentrated GF (CGF), one of the platelet generations, was combined with a bone transplant. The purpose of this study was to determine how concentrated SB development affects bone density and volume surrounding dental implants. Two patients with grossly decayed tooth or grade III mobile tooth were included in the study. After extraction of the tooth, SB enriched with CGF was placed in the socket and closed with membrane. After 1 month of socket preservation, dental implantation is performed. Loading of implant is performed after 3 months of implant placement. Bone volume and density measurements were performed immediately after socket preservation (T0), 1 month after socket preservation after implant placement (T1), and 3 months after socket preservation loading of dental implants (T2) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Bone volume and density increased 3 months after socket preservation loading of dental implant (T2) when compared to baseline that is immediately after socket preservation (T0) and 1 month of socket preservation after implant placement (T1). Also, improvement is seen after 1 month of socket preservation. It was observed that SB with CGF shows excellent enhancement in bone formation in quality and quantity of the bone after socket preservation and loading of implant compared with CGF alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.