ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Evlaution of Different Suturing Techniques in Deep Third Molar Surgery: An Original Research.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluation of oral mucositis severity and management in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: A prospective study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Microbiological Analysis of Bacterial Plaque on Various Suture Types Used in Third Molar Surgical Extraction: a Systematic Review.Journal of oral & maxillofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of various suturing methods used in deep third molar extraction procedures. Methods: A total of four suturing method groups-simple interrupted, horizontal mattress, vertical mattress, and figure-of-eight-were randomly allocated to 100 patients having deep third molar surgery. Assessments were conducted on wound healing, operation time, intraoperative problems, postoperative pain scores, swelling measures, and patient satisfaction questionnaires. Appropriate tests were used for statistical analysis, with Results: Compared to other procedures, the figure-of-eight technique showed better results in terms of postoperative pain scores, swelling measures, wound healing percentages, and patient satisfaction ( Conclusion: In conclusion, there seems to be a benefit to using the figure-of-eight suturing approach for deep third molar surgery in terms of improved postoperative results and patient satisfaction. It is recommended that clinicians give this strategy some thought to improve patient care and surgical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.