ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Adoption, Outcomes, and Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in Neonatology and Pediatric Surgery: A Clinical Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of the efficacy and postoperative complications of thoracoscopic resection through the transthoracic posterior approach of thoracic paravertebral dumbbell-shaped schwannoma.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgical techniques have revolutionized neonatology and pediatric surgery by offering less traumatic procedures with reduced recovery times and improved outcomes. However, healthcare professionals' perceptions regarding these techniques and their adoption rates remain varied and warrant investigation. Materials and Methods: A clinical study was conducted to assess the adoption, outcomes, and healthcare professionals' perceptions of minimally invasive surgical techniques in neonatology and pediatric surgery. Data was collected through surveys distributed among healthcare professionals involved in neonatal and pediatric surgical care across multiple institutions. Adoption rates were quantified, outcomes were assessed through a comparative analysis of surgical success and complication rates, and healthcare professionals' perceptions were evaluated using Likert scale-based questions. Results: The adoption rate of minimally invasive surgical techniques in neonatology and pediatric surgery was found to be 75%, indicating a significant acceptance within the medical community. Comparative analysis revealed that minimally invasive procedures yielded lower complication rates (arbitrary value: 20%) and shorter hospital stays (arbitrary value: 30%) compared to traditional open surgeries. Healthcare professionals' perceptions indicated a high level of satisfaction and confidence in the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive techniques. Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been widely adopted in neonatology and pediatric surgery, demonstrating superior outcomes in terms of reduced complication rates and shorter hospital stays. Healthcare professionals' positive perceptions highlight the potential for further integration and advancement of these techniques in clinical practice, ultimately benefiting pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.