ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Comparative Study of the Influence of Dental Implant Design on the Stress and Strain Distribution using the Finite Element Method.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fixture design effects on posterior dental implant stability using finite element analysis (FEA): a systematic review.Head & face medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Posterior implant angulation without cantilever reduction in mandibular All-on-4: a controlled finite element analysis of stress transfer and implant macrodesign effects.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effects of Implants with Different Geometries on the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Under Occlusal Stresses.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Influence of Thread Geometry and Bone Density on Stress Distribution in Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Biomechanics of different thread designs of dental implants assisting unilateral free end mandibular partial dentures.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One emerging and important research method for biomechanical assessments in biological investigations is the finite element analysis (FEA). It is the best technique for simulating intricate structures and examining their mechanical characteristics. Aim: This study was conducted to compare the V-shaped design and square thread design regarding their influence on the stress and strain distribution using the finite element method. Methods and Materials: Forty dental implants with two different designs were used. These designs were V-shaped design and square design. Utilizing Creo 2.0, cortical bone, cancellous bone, and implants were modeled. FEM analysis was performed on forty model assemblies. Results: It was observed that mean load 1 values for squared thread design were lesser as compared to V-shaped thread design at coronal one-third middle one-third and apical one-third in the cancellous bone as well as implant surface. Conclusion: The design of implant is an important factor influencing the stress and strain distribution using the finite element method with a square design showing reduced concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.