ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2024
Busin Glide-Assisted Pull-Through Insertion of Artificial Corneal Endothelium (EndoArt).
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- EndoArt in Corneal Endothelial Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications.Cureus · 2026Review
- Artificial and Bioengineered Therapeutic Options for Corneal Endothelial Disease.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Corneal Artificial Endothelial Layer (EndoArt): Literature Review and Our Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, the push-in technique through the corneal tunnel using a blunt-tip spatula is used to insert an artificial corneal endothelium (EndoArt) into the anterior chamber (AC). The device is useful for patients with bullous keratopathy; however, it may be difficult to manipulate the very thin implant through hazy cornea. Unlike DMEK graft, it cannot be stained and the F-mark is faint. So, visualizing and orienting the implant is a real challenge especially through a hazy cornea and inadequate AC visualization. Therefore, alternative EndoArt implantation techniques are needed in patients with advanced endothelial dysfunction to avoid complications. Purpose: To report an alternative technique for EndoArt implantation using a Busin glide. Technique: The EndoArt was loaded onto the Busin glide with the concave side of the EndoArt facing upward and was then pulled/pushed into the Busin glide opening. After the Descemet's membrane and endothelium were detached and removed in a circular fashion in a patient with advanced corneal endothelial decompensation, the Busin glide was inserted into the corneal incision, and the EndoArt was slowly pulled into the AC using retractor forceps. Finally, the air was injected into the AC. Conclusion: The Busin glide-assisted pull-through technique smoothly and securely inserted the EndoArt into the AC without upside-down attachment. This alternative technique can be useful for patients with a history of repeat intraocular surgeries or trauma with severe corneal edema to avoid potential complications such as epithelial implantation cysts or downgrowth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.