ArticlePeerJ2024
RNA sequencing identifies lung cancer lineage and facilitates drug repositioning.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene Expression Clustering of Lung Adenocarcinoma Tumors as a Prognosis Tool to Infer Progression-Free Survival.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Integrating bioinformatics, molecular dynamics simulation and experimental verification to screen diagnostic biomarkers for polyamine metabolism-related osteoarthritis and predict potential drugs.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- High-resolution transcriptomics analysis of CXCL13Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent breakthrough therapies have improved survival rates in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but a paradigm for prospective confirmation is still lacking. Patientdatasets were mainly downloaded from TCGA, CPTAC and GEO. We conducted downstream analysis by collecting metagenes and generated 42-gene subtype classifiers to elucidate biological pathways. Subsequently, scRNA, eRNA, methylation, mutation, and copy number variation were depicted from a phenotype perspective. Enhancing the clinical translatability of molecular subtypes, preclinical models including CMAP, CCLE, and GDSC were utilized for drug repositioning. Importantly, we verified the presence of previously described three phenotypes including bronchioid, neuroendocrine, and squamoid. Poor prognosis was seen in squamoid and neuroendocrine clusters for treatment-naive and immunotherapy populations. The neuroendocrine cluster was dominated by STK11 mutations and 14q13.3 amplifications, whose related methylated loci are predictive of immunotherapy. And the greatest therapeutic potential lies in the bronchioid cluster. We further estimated the relative cell abundance of the tumor microenvironment (TME), specific cell types could be reflected among three clusters. Meanwhile, the higher portion of immune cell infiltration belonged to bronchioid and squamoid, not the neuroendocrine cluster. In drug repositioning, MEK inhibitors resisted bronchioid but were squamoid-sensitive. To conceptually validate compounds/targets, we employed RNA-seq and CCK-8/western blot assays. Our results indicated that dinaciclib and alvocidib exhibited similar activity and sensitivity in the neuroendocrine cluster. Also, a lineage factor named KLF5 recognized by inferred transcriptional factors activity could be suppressed by verteporfin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.