Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346055›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

RAPiD: a rapid and accurate plant pathogen identification pipeline for on-site nanopore sequencing.

Stephen Knobloch, Fatemeh Salimi, Anthony Buaya, Sebastian Ploch, Marco Thines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen KnoblochSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Society for Nature Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Fatemeh SalimiSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Society for Nature Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Anthony BuayaSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Society for Nature Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sebastian PlochSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Society for Nature Research, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7129-4523
Marco ThinesSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberg Society for Nature Research, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopore sequencing technology has enabled the rapid, on-site taxonomic identification of samples from anything and anywhere. However, sequencing errors, inadequate databases, as well as the need for bioinformatic expertise and powerful computing resources, have hampered the widespread use of the technology for pathogen identification in the agricultural sector. Here we present RAPiD, a lightweight and accurate real-time taxonomic profiling pipeline. Compared to other metagenomic profilers, RAPiD had a higher classification precision achieved through the use of a curated, non-redundant database of common agricultural pathogens and extensive quality filtering of alignments. On a fungal, bacterial and mixed mock community RAPiD was the only pipeline to detect all members of the communities. We also present a protocol for in-field sample processing enabling pathogen identification from plant sample to sequence within 3 h using low-cost equipment. With sequencing costs continuing to decrease and more high-quality reference genomes becoming available, nanopore sequencing provides a viable method for rapid and accurate pathogen identification in the field. A web implementation of the RAPiD pipeline for real-time analysis is available at https://agrifuture.senckenberg.de.

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingBacteriaComputational BiologyFungiMetagenomicsPlant DiseasesPlantsSequence Analysis, DNAMetagenomicsNanopore sequencingOn-site sequencingPlant pathogensRealtime genomics

Identifiers

PMID39346055
PMCPMC11438431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.