ArticleISME communications2024
Quantifying microbial DNA in metagenomes improves microbial trait estimation.
Article in ISME communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional-Taxonomic Scaling Resolves Conflicting Average Genome Size Estimates Across Environmental Gradients.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Contrasting adaptations of soil prokaryotes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in saline wildland and non-saline farmland.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- Large-scale estimation of bacterial and archaeal DNA prevalence in metagenomes reveals biome-specific patterns.mSystems · 2026Article
- Root microbiome dynamics favor slow-growth strategies duringISME communications · 2026Article
- Can Amplicon Sequencing Be Replaced by Metagenomics for Biodiversity Inventories?Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- The Earth Hologenome Initiative: Data Release 1.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shotgun metagenomics is a powerful tool for studying the genomic traits of microbial community members, such as genome size, gene content, etc. While such traits can be used to better understand the ecology and evolution of microbial communities, the accuracy of their estimations can be critically influenced by both known and unknown factors. One factor that can bias trait estimations is the proportion of eukaryotic and viral DNA in a metagenome, as some bioinformatic tools assume that all DNA reads in a metagenome are bacterial or archaeal. Here, we add to a recent debate about the influence of eukaryotic DNA in the estimation of average genome size from a global soil sample dataset using a new bioinformatic tool. Contrary to what was assumed, our reanalysis of this dataset revealed that soil samples can contain a substantial proportion of non-microbial DNA, which severely inflated the original estimates of average genome size. Correcting for this bias significantly improves the statistical support for the negative relationship between average bacterial genome size and soil pH. These results highlight that metagenomes can contain large quantities of non-microbial DNA and that new methods that correct for this can improve microbial trait estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.