Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39345964›Full record

Review3 Biotech2024

Unveiling the secrets of abiotic stress tolerance in plants through molecular and hormonal insights.

Saurabh Gupta, Rasanpreet Kaur, Anshu Upadhyay, Arjun Chauhan, Vishal Tripathi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Understanding the Role of Durum Wheat ThioredoxinPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saurabh Gupta *Department of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh India.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-2033
Rasanpreet Kaur *Department of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh India.
Anshu UpadhyayDepartment of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh India.
Arjun ChauhanDepartment of Biotechnology, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh India.
Vishal TripathiDepartment of Biotechnology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, 248002 Uttarakhand India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytohormones are signaling substances that control essential elements of growth, development, and reactions to environmental stress. Drought, salt, heat, cold, and floods are a few examples of abiotic factors that have a significant impact on plant development and survival. Complex sensing, signaling, and stress response systems are needed for adaptation and tolerance to such pressures. Abscisic acid (ABA) is a key phytohormone that regulates stress responses. It interacts with the jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) signaling pathways to direct resources toward reducing the impacts of abiotic stressors rather than fighting against pathogens. Under exposure to nanoparticles, the plant growth hormones also function as molecules that regulate stress and are known to be involved in a variety of signaling cascades. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are detected in excess while under stress, and nanoparticles can control their formation. Understanding the way these many signaling pathways interact in plants will tremendously help breeders create food crops that can survive in deteriorating environmental circumstances brought on by climate change and that can sustain or even improve crop production. Recent studies have demonstrated that phytohormones, such as the traditional auxins, cytokinins, ethylene, and gibberellins, as well as more recent members like brassinosteroids, jasmonates, and strigolactones, may prove to be significant metabolic engineering targets for creating crop plants that are resistant to abiotic stress. In this review, we address recent developments in current understanding regarding the way various plant hormones regulate plant responses to abiotic stress and highlight instances of hormonal communication between plants during abiotic stress signaling. We also discuss new insights into plant gene and growth regulation mechanisms during stress, phytohormone engineering, nanotechnological crosstalk of phytohormones, and Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria's Regulatory Powers (PGPR) via the involvement of phytohormones.

Indexed as

Abiotic stressDevelopmentPhytohormonesRegulationSignaling

Identifiers

PMID39345964
PMCPMC11427653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.