Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39345875›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2024

Examining longitudinal associations between initial perceptions and experiences with electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use and use patterns among adults who smoke and recently initiated ENDS.

Michelle Mavreles Ogrodnick, Nikita G Kute, Vuong Van Do, Paige Wiley, Katherine Henderson, Claire A Spears, Terry F Pechacek, Scott R Weaver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michelle Mavreles Ogrodnick *Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States.
Nikita G Kute *Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States.
Vuong Van DoCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Paige WileyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States.
Katherine HendersonDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States.
Claire A SpearsDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States.
Terry F PechacekDepartment of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States.
Scott R WeaverDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States.

Funding

Smokers’ Decision-Making about Tobacco Use: The Interplay of Affective and Cognitive Factors with Product CharacteristicsR01CA235719 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PECHACEK, TERRY FRANK, WEAVER, SCOTT R · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLimited data exist on factors associated with concurrent use patterns of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and cigarettes. We examined longitudinally perceptions and experiences with ENDS in relationship to concurrent use patterns among established, recent smokers who recently initiated ENDS.

methodsParticipant recruitment took place using paid digital advertisements on social media. Between December 2020 and October 2021, 303 adults aged ≥21 years from across the US who currently or recently smoked and had initiated ENDS use within the past 30 days or reinitiated ENDS use after more than one year of non-use were surveyed. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to analyze association between the outcome of current use pattern at follow-up at 1 month [rejectors (discontinued ENDS, continued smoking), primary smokers (concurrent users, mostly smoke), dual user (similar smoking and ENDS use), primary vapers (concurrent users, mostly vape), and switchers (discontinued smoking, continued using ENDS) or quitters (discontinued both smoking and ENDS] and perceptions of and experiences with ENDS predictors at baseline.

resultsAt follow-up at 1 to 2 months after initiating ENDS, 20% were rejectors, 31% were primary smokers, 13% were dual users, 19% were primary vapers, and 17% were switchers/quitters. Perceiving ENDS as less harmful than smoking or being uncertain and as equally or more enjoyable smoking, experiencing a lot or complete reduction in cravings to smoking and in irritability with ENDS use, liking the taste of ENDS, and being satisfied with vaping were associated with higher odds of quitting smoking compared to rejecting ENDS or mostly smoking at follow-up at 1 month.

conclusionsFindings highlight the importance of initial ENDS perceptions and experiences when examining tobacco outcomes and potentially for developing policies and interventions targeting smoking cessation. ENDS initiators are differentiating into distinct use patterns based on these factors within a short period of time.

Indexed as

dual userselectronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)tobacco regulatory sciencetobacco users

Identifiers

PMID39345875
PMCPMC11427937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.