Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39345820›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

The Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework: An Innovative and Rigorous Set of Methods to Evaluate Integrated Care Programs.

Jamey J Lister, Holly H Lister, Kristen G Powell, Shannon P Cheung, N Andrew Peterson, Anna Marie Toto, Stephanie C Marcello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamey J ListerSchool of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8132-3781
Holly H ListerCenter for Integrated Care, Behavioral Research and Training Institute, Rutgers University Behavioral Health Care, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5943-0134
Kristen G PowellNortheast & Caribbean Prevention Technology Transfer Center, Center for Prevention Science, School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7541-1654
Shannon P CheungSchool of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-642X
N Andrew PetersonNortheast & Caribbean Prevention Technology Transfer Center, Center for Prevention Science, School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2759-000X
Anna Marie TotoCenter for Integrated Care, Behavioral Research and Training Institute, Rutgers University Behavioral Health Care, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7362-5763
Stephanie C MarcelloCenter for Integrated Care, Behavioral Research and Training Institute, Rutgers University Behavioral Health Care, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6175-1695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Integrated care programs that prioritize comprehensive service delivery for behavioural health and medical conditions have the potential to improve patient outcomes. Few programs, however, use data-driven methods to guide program evaluation and implementation, limiting their effectiveness, as well as the scope of findings in the research literature. Purpose: To address these gaps, we describe an innovative and rigorous evaluative research framework: the Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework, designed to be tailorable across conditions and care settings. Method: The RICE Research Framework is guided by two core concepts: (1) an approach built on engaging as equal partners and (2) data source triangulation. For the former, the approach relies on multiple teams (Project, Clinical Site, Evaluation, and Consumer) working in collaboration. While teams have specific roles, all teams engage frequently as equal partners to facilitate performance and advance research deliverables. For the latter, we provide a template with recommended primary and secondary data sources with areas of focus, applicable methods, and samples. These sources, when used in combination, can guide implementation, advance replicability, develop/refine health care programs, and foster dissemination of scientific findings. Conclusions: We recommend clinicians and scientists implement the RICE Research Framework to enhance their integrated care programs.

Indexed as

behavioural healthevaluationintegrated caremedicalmethodologyresearch

Identifiers

PMID39345820
PMCPMC11428653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.