ReviewBiophysical reviews2024
Structure-based prediction of protein-nucleic acid binding using graph neural networks.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- SoPPIs: a highly parallelized protein-protein-interaction screening method in prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Predicting protein-nucleic acid interactions via protein language models with biophysical and evolutionary priors.iScience · 2026Article
- A DNN Biophysics Model with Topological and Electrostatic Features.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- DNA breathing and shape encode distinct mechanisms of transcription factor binding.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nanoarchitectonics for Smart Targeted Drug Delivery.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- MegSite: an accurate nucleic acid-binding residue prediction method based on multimodal protein language model.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- DeepDeconUQ estimates malignant cell fraction prediction intervals in bulk RNA-seq tissue.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- A new strategy for Cas protein recognition based on graph neural networks and SMILES encoding.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Highly Optimized Simulation of Atomic Resolution Cell-Like Protein Environment.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Contribution of DNA breathing to physical interactions with transcription factors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- DNAproDB: an updated database for the automated and interactive analysis of protein-DNA complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Accurate prediction of nucleic acid binding proteins using protein language model.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Twenty years of advances in prediction of nucleic acid-binding residues in protein sequences.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Special issue: Multiscale simulations of DNA from electrons to nucleosomes.Biophysical reviews · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-nucleic acid (PNA) binding plays critical roles in the transcription, translation, regulation, and three-dimensional organization of the genome. Structural models of proteins bound to nucleic acids (NA) provide insights into the chemical, electrostatic, and geometric properties of the protein structure that give rise to NA binding but are scarce relative to models of unbound proteins. We developed a deep learning approach for predicting PNA binding given the unbound structure of a protein that we call PNAbind. Our method utilizes graph neural networks to encode the spatial distribution of physicochemical and geometric properties of protein structures that are predictive of NA binding. Using global physicochemical encodings, our models predict the overall binding function of a protein, and using local encodings, they predict the location of individual NA binding residues. Our models can discriminate between specificity for DNA or RNA binding, and we show that predictions made on computationally derived protein structures can be used to gain mechanistic understanding of chemical and structural features that determine NA recognition. Binding site predictions were validated against benchmark datasets, achieving AUROC scores in the range of 0.92-0.95. We applied our models to the HIV-1 restriction factor APOBEC3G and showed that our model predictions are consistent with and help explain experimental RNA binding data. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12551-024-01201-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.