ReviewFrontiers in physiology2024
Therapeutics for sickle cell disease intravascular hemolysis.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severe Acute Hypertension Causes Hemolysis With Release of PEP and ACE Inhibitor.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Article
- Identification of scavenger receptor BI as a scavenger of free heme that is essential for protection against hemolysis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Hepatic Enzyme Abnormalities and Their Association With Hematological Parameters in Sickle Cell Disease: A Case-Control Study in Cameroon.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Immunopathogenesis of Sickle Cell Disease: Mechanisms of Immune Dysregulation and Clinical Consequences, a Narrative Review.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder predominantly affecting individuals of African descent, with a significant global health burden. SCD is characterized by intravascular hemolysis, driven by the polymerization of mutated hemoglobin within red blood cells (RBCs), leading to vascular inflammation, organ damage, and heme toxicity. Clinical manifestations include acute pain crises, hemolytic anemia, and multi-organ dysfunction, imposing substantial morbidity and mortality challenges. Current therapeutic strategies mitigate these complications by increasing the concentration of RBCs with normal hemoglobin via transfusion, inducing fetal hemoglobin, restoring nitric oxide signaling, inhibiting platelet-endothelium interaction, and stabilizing hemoglobin in its oxygenated state. While hydroxyurea and gene therapies show promise, each faces distinct challenges. Hydroxyurea's efficacy varies among patients, and gene therapies, though effective, are limited by issues of accessibility and affordability. An emerging frontier in SCD management involves harnessing endogenous clearance mechanisms for hemolysis products. A recent work by Heggland et al. showed that CD-36-like proteins mediate heme absorption in hematophagous ectoparasite, a type of parasite that feeds on the blood of its host. This discovery underscores the need for further investigation into scavenger receptors (e.g., CD36, SR-BI, SR-BII) for their possible role in heme uptake and detoxification in mammalian species. In this review, we discussed current SCD therapeutics and the specific stages of pathophysiology they target. We identified the limitations of existing treatments and explored potential future developments for novel SCD therapies. Novel therapeutic targets, including heme scavenging pathways, hold the potential for improving outcomes and reducing the global burden of SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.