ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024
Imatinib Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Belgium: Evidence from Real-World Data.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Imatinib adherence and persistence are key components of the successful treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML). In Belgium, there is no study assessing these behaviors at a national level. Our study aimed to provide the first nationwide measure and to identify associated pharmacy-based predictors (age, gender, comorbidities). We also assessed mortality and transplantation incidence according to adherence status. Methods: Based on medico-administrative database linkage, we identified a retrospective Belgian cohort of 1194 patients diagnosed with CML between 2004 and 2016 and treated with imatinib. Adherence was measured over 24 months, considering the proportion of days covered (PDC). Persistence was measured as the time until discontinuation (gap of ≥90 days). Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust standard error were conducted to identify predictors associated with adherence (≥90% PDC). To identify factors associated with persistence, a multivariable Cox regression was performed. Results: At six months, 60.3% of patients were adherent, declining to 41.5% at 12 months, and to 30.1% at two-year follow-up (n=998). Adherence was greater at a younger age (eg 31-40 years vs ≥75 years, adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) 1.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-2.77) and among patients with no comorbidity (0 vs ≥2 comorbidities (aPR 1.56; 95% CI: 1.11-2.19). The median persistence was 334.5 days (Q1:200-Q3:505.5); persistence at 24 months was 83.6% (n=998). Only age was associated with higher risk of discontinuation, with adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 6.05 for patients ≥75 years (95% CI: 5.52-6.58). Transplants and deaths mainly occurred in patients defined as non-adherent at 24 months. Conclusion: This Belgian nationwide representative study revealed a critical low level of imatinib adherence, which decreased over time even though persistence was high at six months. We pinpointed pharmacy-based predictors that were easily identifiable by health care stakeholders in order to undertake interventions to improve adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.