Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39345701›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024

Mentoring up: How mentorship training influences mentee intent to change behavior.

Jonathan Orsini, So Hee Hyun, Fatima Sancheznieto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan OrsiniOffice of the President, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9473-6550
So Hee HyunInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-9541
Fatima SancheznietoInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-8840

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate data from different implementations of the Methods: The data set included 401 respondents who consented to participate after 59 Results: Quantitative analysis showed that intent to change, perceived value of training, training modality, and prior mentor training were all significantly associated with the magnitude of change in MCA scores between pre- and post-tests. Further, participants who engaged in face-to-face training found significantly more value in the training than those who participated online. Analysis of open-ended questions demonstrated that participants with larger changes in MCA scores were more likely to address core principles of Conclusion: Participants improved their mentoring competence by participating in the

Indexed as

Chi-squarementee trainingmentoring competencementoring upMentorship education

Identifiers

PMID39345701
PMCPMC11428057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.