ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
A pictographic guide for decision making in surgery for pelvic bone sarcoma.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic bone sarcoma surgery is challenging due to complex anatomy, proximity to major neurovascular structures, and, more importantly, the potential for complications. Decision-making is vital in offering patients the best oncological and functional outcomes after surgery. Multidisciplinary teams involved from the stage of diagnosis and treatment planning, followed by surgery by experienced teams have proven to be beneficial. Tumour-free margin clearance is essential, and surgical planning must be tailored to achieve the same. The choice of reconstruction needs to be decided based on the amount of bone resected and the available expertise and resources. Lesions isolated only to PI or PIII region may not need reconstruction. Though pedestal cups and Custom-made prosthesis are useful in reconstruction after periacetabular tumour resections, hip transposition surgery is also widely practiced by surgeons with favourable outcomes particularly after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy/proton beam therapy. Navigation has shown promise in achieving tumour-negative margins and disease-free progression particularly in chondrosarcoma. A flap-based approach can be considered for hindquarter amputations; however, patients need to be counseled regarding the complications following this surgery. This article, with proposed flowcharts, is aimed at providing practicing surgeons with a guide toward decision-making while planning pelvic bone sarcoma surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.