ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Feature-specific divisive normalization improves natural image encoding for depth perception.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vision science and visual neuroscience seek to understand how stimulus and sensor properties limit the precision with which behaviorally-relevant latent variables are encoded and decoded. In the primate visual system, binocular disparity-the canonical cue for stereo-depth perception-is initially encoded by a set of binocular receptive fields with a range of spatial frequency preferences. Here, with a stereo-image database having ground-truth disparity information at each pixel, we examine how response normalization and receptive field properties determine the fidelity with which binocular disparity is encoded in natural scenes. We quantify encoding fidelity by computing the Fisher information carried by the normalized receptive field responses. Several findings emerge from an analysis of the response statistics. First, broadband (or feature-unspecific) normalization yields Laplace-distributed receptive field responses, and narrowband (or feature-specific) normalization yields Gaussian-distributed receptive field responses. Second, the Fisher information in narrowband-normalized responses is larger than in broadband-normalized responses by a scale factor that grows with population size. Third, the most useful spatial frequency decreases with stimulus size and the range of spatial frequencies that is useful for encoding a given disparity decreases with disparity magnitude, consistent with neurophysiological findings. Fourth, the predicted patterns of psychophysical performance, and absolute detection threshold, match human performance with natural and artificial stimuli. The current computational efforts establish a new functional role for response normalization, and bring us closer to understanding the principles that should govern the design of neural systems that support perception in natural scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.