ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Regulatory logic and transposable element dynamics in nematode worm genomes.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome sequencing has revealed a tremendous diversity of transposable elements (TEs) in eukaryotes but there is little understanding of the evolutionary processes responsible for TE diversity. Non-autonomous TEs have lost the machinery necessary for transposition and rely on closely related autonomous TEs for critical proteins. We studied two mathematical models of TE regulation, one assuming that both autonomous tranposons and their non-autonomous relatives operate under the same regulatory logic, competing for transposition resources, and one assuming that autonomous TEs self-attenuate transposition while non-autonomous transposons continually increase, parasitizing their autonomous relatives. We implemented these models in stochastic simulations and studied how TE regulatory relationships influence transposons and populations. We found that only outcrossing populations evolving with Parasitic TE regulation resulted in stable maintenance of TEs. We tested our model predictions in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.