ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Anisotropy of object nonrigidity: High-level perceptual consequences of cortical anisotropy.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We demonstrate an unexpected anisotropy in perceived object non-rigidity, a higher-level perceptual phenomenon, and explain it by the population distribution of low-level neuronal properties in primary visual cortex. We measured the visual interpretation of two rigidly connected rotating circular rings. In videos where observers predominantly perceived rigidly-connected horizontally rotating rings, they predominantly perceived non-rigid independently wobbling rings if the video was rotated by 90°. Additionally, vertically rotating rings appeared narrower and longer than horizontally rotating counterparts. We decoded these perceived shape changes from V1 outputs incorporating documented cortical anisotropies in orientation selectivity: more cells and narrower tuning for the horizontal orientation than for vertical. Even when shapes were matched, the non-rigidity anisotropy persisted, suggesting uneven distributions of motion-direction mechanisms. When cortical anisotropies were incorporated into optic flow computations, the kinematic gradients (Divergence, Curl, Deformation) for vertical rotations aligned more with derived gradients for physical non-rigidity, while those for horizontal rotations aligned closer to rigidity. Our results reveal how high-level non-rigidity percepts can be shaped by hardwired cortical anisotropies. Cortical anisotropies are claimed to promote efficient encoding of statistical properties of natural images, but their surprising contribution to failures of shape constancy and object rigidity raise questions about their evolutionary function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.