ArticleCentral European journal of urology2024
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia using Schelin catheter: a preliminary communication.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and advantages of the use of transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using Schelin Catheter Material and methods: TUIA was performed using SC, a catheter equipped with an operative channel with a retractile needle, a standard drainage outlet, and a balloon port. After inserting the SC into the patient's urethra and filling the balloon to anchor it in the bladder neck, four target injections with local anesthetic were performed, one in each quadrant in the base area of the prostate. After injections, the catheter was removed and the HoLEP procedure started. During the procedure, patients also received moderate sedation/analgesia. Results: We selected two 63-year-old patients with good performance status. Prostate volume was 40 ml for the first patient and 31 ml for the second. TUIA and HoLEP operative times were 68 minutes in the first patient and 42 minutes in the second.During the procedure, patients complained of only minimal discomfort, and during hospitalization patients' numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ranging from 1 to 0, with no need for additional analgesics. No complications were reported perioperatively and 15 days after the procedure. Conclusions: This is the first report on TUIA via SC in patients undergoing HoLEP. In our preliminary experience, TUIA via SC was safe and feasible, showing complete perioperative pain control. Further studies are needed to confirm these promising results and better define the category of patients eligible for this type of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.