Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39345225›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2024

The foundation for the microbiology laboratory's essential role in diagnostic stewardship: an ASM Laboratory Practices Subcommittee report.

Rebekah E Dumm, Elizabeth M Marlowe, Logan Patterson, Paige M K Larkin, Rosemary C She, Laura M Filkins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tri-layer microbiology for LMIC Hospitals: linking syndromic panels with reflex culture and targeted sequencing for real world care - a narrative review.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebekah E DummDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-3153
Elizabeth M MarloweQuest Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Logan PattersonUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4825-0565
Paige M K LarkinAmerican Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA.
Rosemary C SheDepartment of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Laura M FilkinsDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-4947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic stewardship (DxS) has gained traction in recent years as a cross-disciplinary method to improve the quality of patient care while appropriately managing resources within the healthcare system. Clinical microbiology laboratorians have been highly engaged in DxS efforts to guide best practices with conventional microbiology tests and more recently with molecular infectious disease diagnostics. Laboratories can experience resistance to their role in DxS, especially when the clinical benefits, motivations for interventions, and underlying regulatory requirements are not clearly conveyed to stakeholders. Clinical laboratories must not only ensure ethical practices but also meet obligatory requirements to steward tests responsibly. In this review, we aim to support clinical microbiology laboratorians by providing the background and resources that demonstrate the laboratory's essential role in DxS. The heart of this review is to collate regulatory and accreditation requirements that, in essence, mandate DxS practices as a long-standing, core element of high-quality laboratory testing to deliver the best possible patient care. While examples of the clinical impact of DxS are plentiful in the literature, here, we focus on the operational and regulatory justification for the laboratory's role in stewardship activities.

Indexed as

Laboratories, ClinicalAntimicrobial StewardshipHumansLaboratoriesMicrobiological Techniquesdiagnostic stewardshipinfectious disease diagnosticslaboratory accreditationregulatory compliance

Identifiers

PMID39345225
PMCPMC11481557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.