ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
A Constraint-Based Orbital-Optimized Excited State Method (COOX).
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A detailed comparison of ΔSCF methods with the constraint-based orbital-optimized excited state method.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- Leveraging Configuration Interaction Singles for Qualitative Descriptions of Ground and Excited States: State-Averaging, Linear-Response, and Spin-Projection.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Freeze-and-Release Direct Optimization Method for Variational Calculations of Excited Electronic States.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Nonorthogonal Configuration Interaction of Constraint-Based Orbital-Optimized Excited States: A Versatile Method for Theoretical Photochemistry.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Highly Accurate and Robust Constraint-Based Orbital-Optimized Core Excitations.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we present a novel method to directly calculate targeted electronic excited states within a self-consistent field calculation based on constrained density functional theory (cDFT). The constraint is constructed from the static occupied-occupied and virtual-virtual parts of the excited state difference density from (simplified) linear-response time-dependent density functional theory calculations (LR-TDDFT). Our new method shows a stable convergence behavior, provides an accurate excited state density adhering to the Aufbau principle, and can be solved within a restricted SCF for singlet excitations to avoid spin contamination. This also allows the straightforward application of post-SCF electron-correlation methods like MP2 or direct RPA methods. We present the details of our constraint-based orbital-optimized excited state method (COOX) and compare it to similar schemes. The accuracy of excitation energies will be analyzed for a benchmark of systems, while the quality of the resulting excited state densities is investigated by evaluating excited state nuclear forces and excited state structure optimizations. We also investigate the performance of the proposed COOX method for long-range charge transfer excitations and conical intersections with the ground-state.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.