Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344981›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2024

Untangling poikilohydry and desiccation tolerance: evolutionary and macroecological drivers in ferns.

Daniela Aros-Mualin, Michael Kessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniela Aros-MualinDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1526-188X
Michael KesslerDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4612-9937

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundati project MK 310030_188498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPoikilohydry describes the inability of plants to internally regulate their water content (hydroregulation), whereas desiccation tolerance (DT) refers to the ability to restore normal metabolic functions upon rehydration. The failure to clearly separate these two adaptations has impeded a comprehensive understanding of their unique evolutionary and ecological drivers. Unlike bryophytes and angiosperms, these adaptations in ferns are sometimes uncorrelated, offering a unique opportunity to navigate their intricate interplay.

methodsWe classified ferns into two syndromes: the Hymenophyllum-type (H-type), encompassing species with filmy leaves lacking stomata that experience extreme poikilohydry and varying degrees of DT, and the Pleopeltis-type (P-type), consisting of resurrection plants with variable hydroregulation but high DT. KEY

resultsThe H-type evolved during globally cool Icehouse periods, as an adaptation to low light levels in damp, shady habitats, and currently prevails in wet environments. Conversely, the P-type evolved predominantly under Greenhouse periods as an adaptation to periodic water shortage, with most extant species thriving in warm, seasonally dry habitats.

conclusionsOut study underscores the fundamental differences between poikilohydry and DT, emphasizing the imperative to meticulously differentiate and qualify the strength of each strategy as well as their interactions, as a basis for understanding the genetic and evolutionary background of these ecologically crucial adaptations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionDesiccationFernsWaterEcosystemPlant LeavesWaterAbiotic stressdehydrationdroughthomoiohydryresurrection plantswater loss

Identifiers

PMID39344981
PMCPMC11688535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.