ArticleActa ophthalmologica2025
Response predictors of a topical corticosteroid-based regimen for dry eyes: A real-life study.
Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized, single-centre, double-blinded repeated dose investigation of safety and tolerability of ocular administrations of a novel silica eye drop product in healthy volunteers.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Trial
- Response predictors of a topical corticosteroid-based regimen for dry eyes: A real-life study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine the effectiveness and identify clinical response predictors of a short corticosteroid-based regimen consisting of topical preservative-free 0.1% dexamethasone (Monopex®, Théa Laboratories) in conjunction with artificial tears (AT) for dry eyes in a real-life clinical setting.
methodsPatients were recruited from the Norwegian Dry Eye Clinic and were allowed to use ATs of their own choice in addition to the prescribed 14-day topical dexamethasone course. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5), Schirmer test (ST), fluorescein tear film break-up time (FBUT), ocular surface staining (OSS), meibum expressibility (ME), meibum quality (MQ), number of expressible meibomian glands among the central eight glands in the lower lids (N
resultsA total of 167 patients (124 women, mean age 54 years ±17 (standard deviation)) were included. One month after initiation of intervention, OSDI and DEQ5 scores improved from 39.5 ± 22.1 to 31.4 ± 21.3 (p < 0.001) and from 12.6 ± 4.2 to 11.0 ± 4.6 (p < 0.001), respectively. OSS improved from 2.2 ± 1.4 to 1.8 ± 1.5 (p < 0.001), N
conclusionImprovement in dry eye symptoms and signs were observed following a short course of topical, preservative-free 0.1% dexamethasone treatment in combination with AT. Individuals exhibiting more pronounced symptoms and signs witnessed the most profound improvements with the treatment regimen, suggesting that poor baseline parameters may serve as response predictors of the treatment regimen. While the real-life data presented herein are valuable, the conclusions are limited by the inherent biases of a non-controlled study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.