ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2024
Evaluation of Maxillary Protraction Using a Mini Screw-Retained Palatal C-Shaped Plate and Face Mask.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Therapeutic Approaches Dealing with Malocclusion Type III-Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a newly designed minimally invasive palatal-plate face mask combination for the management of developing Class III malocclusion due to maxillary deficiency. Methods: A sample of 16 Class III patients due to maxillary deficiency in the early mixed dentition (8 boys and 8 girls) aged between 7 and 9 years participated in this study and were treated with a combination of palatal plate face masks. Extra-oral elastics were attached between the intra-oral and extra-oral appliances; the elastics were set at 30° to the occlusal plane. The force magnitude was 250-300 g per quadrant. Cephalometric radiographs were taken before and immediately after maxillary protraction. In addition, skeletal measurements were measured, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. The pre- and post-protraction measurements were compared using the Student's t-test, and the significance level was set at a p-value <0.05. Results: A statistically significant increase in SNA angle and maxillary length was observed by 3.13±1.52 degrees and 2.60±0.75 mm (p<0.05), respectively, indicating forward maxillary growth. The skeletal and soft tissue patterns were also improved, as evidenced by the statistically significant increase in the ANB angle, Wits appraisal, and H angle by 4.50±1.28 degrees, 5.30±1.86 mm, and 5.02±3.24 degrees (p<0.05), respectively. A favorable clockwise mandibular rotation was observed as evidenced by the increase in the SN/MP angle and the decrease in the SNB angle by 1.46±1.96 degrees and -1.38±1.86 degrees (p<0.05), respectively. Conclusion: The palatal-plate facemask combination is an effective treatment alternative for Class III malocclusion due to maxillary deficiency with minimal pain and discomfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.