ArticleTurkish journal of orthodontics2024
Bibliometric Analysis of Maxillary Expansion Publications Trends.
Article in Turkish journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects on the midpalatal suture and maxillary arch assessed by occlusal radiographs and three-dimensional digital models in patients treated with invisalign palatal expander and rapid palatal expander: a pilot study.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Trial
- Bibliometric Mapping of Digitalization in Orthodontics: Evaluating Scientific Contributions, Collaboration Networks, and Future Directions.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Maxillary expansion is a common treatment in clinical orthodontics and can be performed in a wide age range using different methods. This bibliometric analysis aims to provide an overview of research on maxillary expansion. Methods: A literature search was performed in the Web of Science database, and publications related to maxillary expansion between 1970 and 2023 were included. Data, including titles, abstracts, keywords, countries, regions, and references, were exported and analyzed within the scope of the bibliometric indicators. Results: The study was conducted on 2633 publications. Between 1970 and 2023, research on maxillary expansion showed a general upward trend in the number of publications. From the analyzed publications, we observed that rapid maxillary expansion (RME) was the most common type of maxillary expansion, accounting for 78% of all publications. Most publications originated from the United States (24.3%), and these articles were also the most cited (17180). Lorenzo Franchi contributed the most publications (85, 3.2%) and was cited 2830 times for maxillary expansion. The highest number of publications was from the University of Sao Paolo (119), and the most cited institution was the University of Florence (3287). Conclusion: The bibliometric indicators showed a rapid increase in the number of published works on the topic of maxillary expansion, particularly in recent years. Advances in patient evaluation (3D imaging, modeling) and application methods (mini-screws, clear aligners) appear to have helped to maintain the popularity of maxillary expansion. We also observed that maxillary expansion is associated with several other specialties in addition to dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.