ArticleClinical transplantation and research2024
Workforce, task performance, and analysis of organ transplant coordinators in Korea: a survey study.
Article in Clinical transplantation and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The workload of organ transplant coordinators is increasing as administrative tasks become more diverse with changing laws and regulations. These changes have heightened the demand for organ transplant coordinators with expertise in the field. This study aimed to determine the status of human resources of organ transplant coordinators and conduct job analysis using the Developing A Curriculum (DACUM) method. Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey with 107 transplant coordinators employed at medical centers across Korea. The questionnaire gathered data on general and job-related characteristics of organ transplant coordinators and assessed the importance, difficulty, and frequency of their task elements. Results: The job of organ transplantation was categorized into five duties, 14 tasks, and 97 task elements. These duties included recipient management, donor management, organ donation activation management, organ transplantation administration, and professional capability development. We noted statistically significant differences in the importance scores of organ donation activation based on age, as well as in the difficulty scores for recipient management and administrative tasks based on work experience. Furthermore, the frequency of task performance varied significantly according to the number of coworkers and the total number of transplants conducted. Conclusions: This study confirmed the current status of the workforce and task performance of organ transplant coordinators. The findings will serve as basic data to enhance the expertise of coordinators in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.