Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344663›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Using Serial 12-Lead ECGs Based on Left Atrial Remodeling.

Ji-Hoon Choi, Sung-Hee Song, Hongryul Kim, Jongwoo Kim, Heesun Park, JaeHu Jeon, JoongSik Hong, Hye Bin Gwag, Sung Ho Lee, Jaichan Lee and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A risk model to predict atrial fibrillation in diabetes using machine learning: The ACCORD study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ji-Hoon ChoiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-400X
Sung-Hee SongWellysis Corp. Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6225-2412
Hongryul KimWellysis Corp. Seoul Republic of Korea.
Jongwoo KimWellysis Corp. Seoul Republic of Korea.
Heesun ParkWellysis Corp. Seoul Republic of Korea.
JaeHu JeonMediFarmSoft Co. Ltd Seoul Republic of Korea.
JoongSik HongMediFarmSoft Co. Ltd Seoul Republic of Korea.
Hye Bin GwagDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Changwon Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5610-2872
Sung Ho LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1018-7871
Jaichan LeeSchool of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering Sungkyunkwan University Suwon Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2730-9492
Soo Jin ChoCenter for Health Promotion, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4361-4988
Seung-Jung ParkDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3288-0594
Young Keun OnDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.
Ju Youn KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5323-3428
Kyoung-Min ParkDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5416-9691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe hypothesized that analysis of serial ECGs could predict new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) more accurately than analysis of a single ECG by detecting the subtle cardiac remodeling that occurs immediately before AF occurrence. Our aim in this study was to compare the performance of 2 types of machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS AND

resultsStandard 12-lead ECGs of patients selected by cardiologists between January 2010 and May 2021 were used for ML model development. Two ML models (single ECG and serial ECG) were developed using a light gradient boosting machine-learning algorithm. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score. We trained the ML models on 415 964 ECGs from 176 090 patients. When testing the 2 ML models using external validation data sets, the performance of the serial-ML model was significantly better than that of the single-ML model for predicting new-onset AF (single- versus serial-ML model: sensitivity 0.744 versus 0.810; specificity 0.742 versus 0.822; accuracy 0.743 versus 0.816; F1 score 0.743 versus 0.815; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.812 versus 0.880;

conclusionsAn ML model based on serial ECGs from an individual had greater ability to predict new-onset AF than the ML model based on a single ECG. P-wave morphologies were associated with future AF prediction.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAtrial RemodelingElectrocardiographyMachine LearningPredictive Value of TestsAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligenceatrial fibrillationECGmachine learningpredictionremodeling

Identifiers

PMID39344663
PMCPMC11681470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.