Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344549›Full record

Observational studyKorean journal of radiology2024

Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules Diagnosed as Bethesda Category III by Ultrasound, Size, and Cytology.

Hye Shin Ahn, Dong Gyu Na, Ji-Hoon Kim

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Korean journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Novel Scoring System for AUS Thyroid Nodule.International journal of endocrinology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hye Shin AhnDepartment of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7260-7467
Dong Gyu NaDepartment of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6422-1652
Ji-Hoon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6349-6950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the performance of an integrated risk stratification system (RSS) based on ultrasound (US) RSSs, nodule size, and cytology subcategory for diagnosing malignancy in thyroid nodules initially identified as Bethesda category III on fine-needle aspiration. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted at two institutions and included consecutive patients with Bethesda category III nodules, and final diagnoses confirmed by repeat biopsy or surgery. A total of 320 Bethesda category III nodules (≥1 cm) from 309 patients (223 female and 86 male; mean age, 50.9 ± 12.0 years) were included. The malignancy risk of Bethesda category III nodules and predictors of malignancy were assessed according to US RSSs, nodule size, and cytology subcategory. The diagnostic performances of US-size cytology (USC) RSS and US RSS alone for malignancy were compared.

resultsThe intermediate or high suspicion US category independently increased the malignancy risk in all US RSSs (

conclusionThe diagnostic performance of USC RSS for malignancy was superior to that of US RSS alone in Bethesda category III nodules. Malignancy can be ruled out in the very low-risk category of USC RSS.

Indexed as

Thyroid NoduleUltrasonographyAdultAgedBiopsy, Fine-NeedleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentThyroid GlandThyroid NeoplasmsFine-needle aspirationThyroid glandThyroid neoplasmsThyroid noduleUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39344549
PMCPMC11444854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.