Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344387›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2024

Mendelian Randomization Study Supports Genetic Liability to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Associated With the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease.

Si Cao, Han Su, Xiaoyi Zhang, Chao Fang, Nayiyuan Wu, Youjie Zeng, Minghua Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Si CaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Han SuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiaoyi ZhangDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Chao FangThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9898-4893
Nayiyuan WuThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5242-3206
Youjie ZengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3842-1815
Minghua ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2022JJ70149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational studies have suggested that obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may be associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, whether OCD is a causal risk factor for AD remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the causal effect of OCD on AD risk by performing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

methodsGenome-wide association summary statistics were obtained for OCD, comprising 2688 cases and 7037 controls, as well as for AD, including 21,982 cases and 41,944 controls from Kunkle et al.'s study, and 39,918 cases and 358,140 controls from Wightman et al.'s study. On the basis of two diverse thresholds, OCD-associated genetic variants were screened as instrumental variables (IVs) for subsequent MR analyses. Inverse variance weighed was the primary MR method. MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode were used as supplementary MR methods. Various sensitivity tests assessed the reliability of MR results.

resultsOn the basis of strict IV selecting thresholds, inverse-variance weighted (IVW) identified significant causal associations between genetic liability to OCD and increased risk of AD in two different sources ((i) Kunkle et al.: odds ratio [OR] = 1.070, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.015-1.127, p = 0.012; (ii) Wightman et al. 0.012; (iii) Wightman et al.: OR = 1.051, 95% CI: 1.014-1.090, p = 0.007). Three other supplementary MR methods yielded similar results to IVWs (OR > 1). Furthermore, all results were replicated in MR analyses based on lenient IV selecting thresholds. The sensitivity tests indicated that MR results were stable and not affected by significant horizontal pleiotropy.

conclusionsThis comprehensive MR study suggests that genetic liability to OCD is a causal risk factor for AD. Early intervention in patients with OCD may be beneficial in preventing future AD progression.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyMendelian Randomization AnalysisObsessive-Compulsive DisorderHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsAlzheimer's diseasecausal inferenceobsessive–compulsive disorderrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39344387
PMCPMC11440019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.