Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344280›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical ultrasound : JCU2025

Enhancing clinical outcomes: Point of care ultrasound in the precision diagnosis and Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in emergency medicine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eman E Shaban, Yavuz Yigit, Baha Alkahlout, Ahmed Shaban, Amira Shaban, Benny Ponappan, Mohammed Abdurabu, Hany A Zaki

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Identified on Point-of-Care Ultrasound.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eman E ShabanDepartment of Cardiology, Al Jufairi Diagnosis and Treatment, MOH, Qatar.
Yavuz YigitDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-983X
Baha AlkahloutDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ahmed ShabanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mansoura General Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt.
Amira ShabanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt.
Benny PonappanDepartment of Cardiology, Al Jufairi Diagnosis and Treatment, MOH, Qatar.
Mohammed AbdurabuDepartment of Cardiology, Al Jufairi Diagnosis and Treatment, MOH, Qatar.
Hany A ZakiDepartment of Cardiology, Al Jufairi Diagnosis and Treatment, MOH, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the emergency department (ED). A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified studies published until July 2024. Nine studies were included, revealing that POCUS is highly accurate in diagnosing AAA, with a pooled sensitivity of 98.33% and specificity of 99.84%. Additionally, data from three studies indicated that 24.5% of patients with positive AAA scans were diagnosed with ruptured AAAs. The results suggest that emergency physicians can accurately detect and manage AAA using POCUS, even with limited training.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalPoint-of-Care SystemsEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyabdominal aorta aneurysmdiagnostic accuracyemergency departmentpoint‐of‐care ultrasoundruptured AAA detection

Identifiers

PMID39344280
PMCPMC11821468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.