Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344169›Full record

ArticleInternational nursing review2025

A qualitative study on Turkey's earthquakes, the century's catastrophe: Perspectives and coping methods of surviving nursing students.

Ebru Sönmez Sari, Handan Terzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International nursing review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ebru Sönmez SariNursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bayburt University, Bayburt, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7337-4853
Handan TerziNursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-4481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo understand the experiences and coping strategies of nursing students who were impacted by Turkey's once-in-a-century catastrophic earthquakes in 2023.

backgroundNursing students rarely experience a disaster in person, and their imagination can be limited.

methodsThis study used a descriptive-qualitative study design. It was conducted with 17 first-year nursing students, studying at a university in the northeastern part of Turkey, who survived the earthquake. A personal information form and a semistructured questionnaire were used to collect the data. The data were collected between March and April 2023 and analyzed using the content analysis method and the MaXQDA programme.

resultsThe data were grouped into three main themes-"What 'earthquake' was and what it is now?," "Am I aware of the 'earthquake' now?," and "Coping mechanisms and supporting systems"-and categorized into seven subthemes.

conclusionsThe experiences of earthquake-affected nursing students emphasized the importance of being prepared for disasters and meeting their emotional needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE AND POLICIES: Including specific courses and case studies regarding disasters, whether natural or human-made, in education programs can ensure better prepared nurses. Also, the integration of content about management and coping with such crises into nursing curricula is considered vital.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalEarthquakesStudents, NursingSurvivorsAdultFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyYoung AdultDisastersearthquakesnursingnursing educationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39344169
PMCPMC11741913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.