Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344113›Full record

ReviewThe world journal of men's health2025

A Review on Testosterone: Estradiol Ratio-Does It Matter, How Do You Measure It, and Can You Optimize It?

Arthur L M Swislocki, Michael L Eisenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The world journal of men's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Impacts of prenatal resiquimod exposure during late gestation on rat offspring development and behavior.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arthur L M SwislockiMedical Service, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1909-7944
Michael L EisenbergUrology Department, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-0141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a natural balance between the major sex steroids, testosterone and estradiol, controlled by gonadal secretion and peripheral conversion by aromatase. This balance is impacted by a variety of inborn and acquired conditions, and, more recently, by a growing use of exogenous testosterone therapy and off-label aromatase use under the guise of "men's health." We summarize reported testosterone:estradiol ratios, both naturally occurring and with pharmacologic manipulation and consider the ramifications of significant changes in these ratios. However, significant limitations exist in terms of steroid separation and measurement techniques, timing of samples, and lack of consistency from one assay to another, as well as definition of normative data. Limited data on the testosterone:estradiol ratio in men exists, particularly due to the scan data on concurrent estradiol values in men receiving testosterone therapy or aromatase inhibitors. Nonetheless, there seems to be a range of apparently beneficial values of the testosterone: estradiol radio at between 10 and 30, calculated as: testosterone in ng/dL/estradiol in pg/mL. Higher values appear to be associated with improved spermatogenesis and reduced bone density while lower values are associated with thyroid dysfunction. While there is growing awareness of the significance of the testosterone:estradiol ratio, and a sense of a desired range, the optimal value has not yet been determined. Further work is needed to clarify the measurement strategies and clearly-defined outcome measures related to the testosterone:estradiol ratio.

Indexed as

AromataseEstradiolGonadal steroid hormonesMen's healthTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID39344113
PMCPMC12257316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.