Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344097›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology progress

From protein structure to an optimized chromatographic capture step using multiscale modeling.

Daphne Keulen, Tim Neijenhuis, Adamantia Lazopoulou, Roxana Disela, Geoffroy Geldhof, Olivier Le Bussy, Marieke E Klijn, Marcel Ottens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daphne KeulenDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8086-333X
Tim NeijenhuisDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6214-5438
Adamantia LazopoulouDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Roxana DiselaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8178-5684
Geoffroy GeldhofGSK, Technical Research & Development - Microbial Drug Substance, Rixensart, Belgium.
Olivier Le BussyGSK, Technical Research & Development - Microbial Drug Substance, Rixensart, Belgium.
Marieke E KlijnDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Marcel OttensDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline BiologicalsTopconsortium voor Kennis en Innovatie
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing a biopharmaceutical chromatographic purification process is currently the greatest challenge during process development. A lack of process understanding calls for extensive experimental efforts in pursuit of an optimal process. In silico techniques, such as mechanistic or data driven modeling, enhance the understanding, allowing more cost-effective and time efficient process optimization. This work presents a modeling strategy integrating quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) models and chromatographic mechanistic models (MM) to optimize a cation exchange (CEX) capture step, limiting experiments. In QSPR, structural characteristics obtained from the protein structure are used to describe physicochemical behavior. This QSPR information can be applied in MM to predict the chromatogram and optimize the entire process. To validate this approach, retention profiles of six proteins were determined experimentally from mixtures, at different pH (3.5, 4.3, 5.0, and 7.0). Four proteins at different pH's were used to train QSPR models predicting the retention volumes and characteristic charge, subsequently the equilibrium constant was determined. For an unseen protein knowing only the protein structure, the retention peak difference between the modeled and experimental peaks was 0.2% relative to the gradient length (60 column volume). Next, the CEX capture step was optimized, demonstrating a consistent result in both the experimental and QSPR-based methods. The impact of model parameter confidence on the final optimization revealed two viable process conditions, one of which is similar to the optimization achieved using experimentally obtained parameters. The multiscale modeling approach reduces the required experimental effort by identification of initial process conditions, which can be optimized.

Indexed as

ProteinsChromatography, Ion ExchangeHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationProtein ConformationQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipProteinsbiopharmaceutical downstream processingchromatographymechanistic modelingprocess optimizationquantitative structure–property relationships

Identifiers

PMID39344097
PMCPMC11831419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.