Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344031›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental quality

Phosphorus lability across diverse agricultural contexts with legacy sources.

Zachary P Simpson, Joshua Mott, Kyle Elkin, Anthony Buda, Joshua Faulkner, Cathleen Hapeman, Greg McCarty, Maryam Foroughi, W Dean Hively, Kevin King and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Zachary P SimpsonUSDA-ARS, Sustainable Water Management Research Unit, Stoneville, Mississippi, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8075-810X
Joshua MottUSDA-ARS, Soil Management and Sugar Beet Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5598-5383
Kyle ElkinUSDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-8680
Anthony BudaUSDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5194-4998
Joshua FaulknerCenter for Sustainable Agriculture, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4695-5334
Cathleen HapemanUSDA-ARS, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory (HRSL), Beltsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3439-2826
Greg McCartyUSDA-ARS, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory (HRSL), Beltsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7064-7166
Maryam ForoughiCollege of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4225-8531
W Dean HivelyUSGS, Lower Mississippi-Gulf Science Center, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5383-8064
Kevin KingUSDA-ARS, Soil Drainage Research Unit, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-9591
Will OsterholzUSDA-ARS, Soil Drainage Research Unit, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2218-9396
Chad PennUSDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2644-6097
Mark WilliamsUSDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8081-8018
Lindsey WitthausUSDA-ARS, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, Mississippi, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0909-060X
Martin LockeUSDA-ARS, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, Mississippi, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7145-530X
Ethan PawlowskiUSDA-ARS, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, Mississippi, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6825-0343
Brent DalzellUSDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research Unit, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9710-6562
Gary FeyereisenUSDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research Unit, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-4594
Christine DolphDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-7809
David BjornebergUSDA-ARS, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Unit, Kimberly, Idaho, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8717-4553
Kossi NouwakpoUSDA-ARS, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Unit, Kimberly, Idaho, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-4169
Christopher W RogersUSDA-ARS, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Unit, Kimberly, Idaho, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-1582
Isis ScottUSDA-ARS, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Unit, Kimberly, Idaho, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3737-3076
Carl H BolsterUSDA-ARS, Food Animal Environmental Systems Research Unit, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6646-0921
Lisa DuriancikUSDA-NRCS, Resource Assessment Branch, Conservation Effects Assessment Project, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0442-9352
Peter J A KleinmanUSDA-ARS, Soil Management and Sugar Beet Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-3736

Funding

Natural Resources Conservation Service NRC21IRA0010879USDA-ARS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The buffering of phosphorus (P) in the landscape delays management outcomes for water quality. If stored in labile form (readily exchangeable and bioavailable), P may readily pollute waters. We studied labile P and its intensity for >600 soils and sediments across seven study locations in the United States. Stocks of labile P were large enough to sustain high P losses for decades, indicating the transport-limited regime typical of legacy P. Sediments were commonly more P-sorptive than nearby soils. Soils in the top 5 cm had 1.3-3.0 times more labile P than soils at 5-15 cm. Stratification in soil test P and total P was, however, less consistent. As P exchange via sorption processes follows the difference in intensities between soil/sediment surface and solution, we built a model for the equilibrium phosphate concentration at net zero sorption (EPC

Indexed as

AgricultureEnvironmental MonitoringPhosphorusSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalGeologic SedimentsSoilUnited StatesPhosphorusSoilSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID39344031
PMCPMC12265865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.