Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39343974›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2024

Normalizing fentanyl: interpreting the perceived 'risk' of correctional officer work.

Rosemary Ricciardelli, Matthew S Johnston, Gillian Foley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rosemary RicciardelliFisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, W3023, 155 Ridge Road, St. John's, NL, A1C 5R3, Canada. rricciardell@mun.ca.
Matthew S JohnstonFisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, W3023, 155 Ridge Road, St. John's, NL, A1C 5R3, Canada. matthew.johnston3@carleton.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0622-2838
Gillian FoleyFisheries and Marine Institute, Memorial University of Newfoundland, W3023, 155 Ridge Road, St. John's, NL, A1C 5R3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScholarship on how fentanyl affects the complexities of correctional settings is limited in Canada, as scholars have focused on the prevalence of opioid use and overdose in prisons, as well as community treatment and access following release. Fentanyl constitutes a continuing challenge both in prisons and broader society.

resultsThe current qualitative, interview-based empirical study examines how fentanyl is interpreted by correctional officers (COs, n = 99) across federal prisons in Canada, some of whom have worked in institutions with a high presence of fentanyl, while others have less exposure to the drug. We found that while many COs had responded to an overdose during their first or second year on the job, most COs who had did not perceive the event to be psychologically traumatic nor were concerned about the presence and availability fentanyl in their work environment, or they were indifferent. Yet this finding competes with the 41.4% of officers who did express concern about the presence of fentanyl - suggesting both a "normalization" of fentanyl as a workplace hazard as well as an underpinning social concern.

conclusionsWe discuss the implications of these complicated findings in relation to reducing workplace stressors and countering misinformation that, in addition to other potential occupational factors, may be responsible for the concerns of COs tied to the presence of fentanyl.

Indexed as

FentanylPrisonsQualitative ResearchAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCanadaCorrectional Facilities PersonnelDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylMisinformationNaloxoneOccupational stressorsOpioidsOverdose

Identifiers

PMID39343974
PMCPMC11439204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.