Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39343912›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

In regard to Castagnola et al. (doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03050-7).

Efsun Somay, Erkan Topkan, Ugur Selek

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Efsun SomayDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, 82. Street No: 26 Bahcelievler, Ankara, Turkey. efsuner@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8251-6913
Erkan TopkanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey.
Ugur SelekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are grateful to the authors of the study by Castagnola et al., which sought to ascertain the prevalence of tooth necrosis in patients undergoing mandibulotomy or mandibulectomy for head and neck cancer. In order to prevent surgical problems, the researchers suggested doing root canal therapy on the teeth next to the surgical site prior to surgery. Although the results offer insightful information about tooth necrosis in patients with head and neck cancer who have had mandibulotomies or mandibulectomy, we would like to voice our concerns about the reported data in order to give a stronger basis for future studies in this field.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsDental Pulp NecrosisHumansMandibular OsteotomyRoot Canal Therapy

Identifiers

PMID39343912
PMCPMC11440927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.