ArticleBMC oral health2024
Methods used for caries detection and diagnosis in Ontario dental practices: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utilization of caries risk assessment tools within the underserved population: a scoping review.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly detection of caries is essential for applying non-surgical treatment procedures and preventing the formation of cavitated lesions leading to unnecessary removal of tooth structure. Understanding dentists' preferences for caries detection tools can inform stakeholders about their strategies and knowledge of contemporary, evidence-based caries management approaches. However, there is a lack of research exploring the detection methods of caries commonly used by dentists in Ontario, Canada. The objective of this study was to investigate the methods of caries detection and diagnosis preferred by dentists in Ontario.
methodsA 21-item self-reported survey was mailed to one thousand Ontario dental practices in the Winter of 2022. Descriptive and bivariate data analysis were performed to determine the associations between: demographics and professional practice characteristics (explanatory variables), and methods for detecting and diagnosing dental caries (outcome variables) using SPSS Statistics 29.0.
resultsA total of 325 dentists (33%) responded to the survey, with 274 answering all of the questions completely. The highest proportion of respondents were 35-44 years of age (32.8%) and male (53.4%). More than half of the respondents reported using a dental explorer to assess primary occlusal caries (57.6%), secondary caries (57.1%), and cervical caries (57.5%). Likewise, 57.9% of the participants reported using dental radiographs to diagnose proximal caries. Among additional caries detection tools, digital radiography (89.8%) and traditional radiography (84.7%) were the most used methods/modalities, while cone beam computed tomography was the least (12.8%). Most study participants did not use any caries classification system (77.7%) or caries risk assessment tool (85.3%).
conclusionsParticipants preferred conventional methods for caries detection, instead of contemporary visual-tactile caries lesions classification and/or caries risk assessment systems. These findings indicate a need for continuing dental education programs tailored to evidence-based caries management approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.