Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39343828›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2024

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between young maternal age and fetal abnormalities.

Jakub Staniczek, Maisa Manasar-Dyrbuś, Magda Rybak-Krzyszkowska, Adrianna Kondracka, Dominika Orszulak, Kacper Niziński, Marcin Sadłocha, Agnieszka Drosdzol-Cop, Rafał Stojko, Miriam Illa

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jakub StaniczekDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland. jstaniczek@sum.edu.pl.
Maisa Manasar-DyrbuśDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland.
Magda Rybak-KrzyszkowskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatology, University Hospital, Krakow, 30-688, Poland.
Adrianna KondrackaDepartment of Obstetrics and Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, 20-059, Poland.
Dominika OrszulakDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland.
Kacper NizińskiDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland.
Marcin SadłochaDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland.
Agnieszka Drosdzol-CopDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland.
Rafał StojkoDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, 40-211, Poland.
Miriam IllaBCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 08028, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal anomalies among young women and adolescents pose major public health concerns. This systematic review aims to elucidate the relationship between young maternal age and the incidence of fetal abnormalities. According to the systematic review and meta-analysis PRISMA protocol, cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies were scrutinized to include 80,393,450 participants across diverse regions. The meta-analysis utilized Odds Ratios (OR) as the effect measure, adopting a random-effects model. The screening process involved 157 selected and verified manuscripts, which ultimately resulted in the final inclusion of 20 studied in the meta-analysis. The criterion for young maternal age was the age of ≤ 20 years. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled OR of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.82-1.05, p = 0.252), indicating no statistically significant association between young maternal age (≤ 20 years) and fetal anomalies. However, considerable heterogeneity (I² = 96.21%) was noted, prompting the use of a random-effects model to derive the reported results. The meta-analysis did not find statistically significant differences in the occurrence of congenital anomalies in fetuses of younger women than in overall population. Although due to significant heterogeneity of the analyzed studies, and a risk of bias, caution should be exercised when interpreting the results, further investigation may be warranted to understand the relationship between maternal age and risk of fetal anomalies. Nevertheless, the study shows significant differences, which diminish in collective analysis, suggests that factors beyond age may be influential. Specifically, the limited access to or quality of healthcare in certain regions could be a more critical factor than maternal age itself.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesMaternal AgeAdolescentAdultFemaleFetusHumansOdds RatioPregnancyYoung AdultAdolescent mothersCongenital anomaliesFetal abnormalitiesYoung maternal age

Identifiers

PMID39343828
PMCPMC11439902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.