ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2024
Fourteen-year follow-up results of imatinib therapy in patients with unresectable and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When precision medicine meets human behavior: limits of artificial intelligence in predicting imatinib adherence.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImatinib therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of unresectable and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, few studies have reported the long-term outcomes of the treatment.
methodsSeventy patients who underwent imatinib therapy for unresectable and metastatic GISTs were enrolled between 2001 and 2009, and follow-up data were collected until October 2023. One hundred and sixty-eight months had passed since the final enrollment. The outcome measures were patient survival and the status of GIST and imatinib therapy. The cumulative incidence of disease progression (PD) and the chronological changes in PD hazard rate (HR) were also analyzed.
resultsThe 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year overall survival rates were 64.3%, 30.0%, 16.8%, and 12.2%, respectively. Sixty of the 70 enrolled patients died before the data cutoff date: 47 (78.3%) patients died of GIST progression while the remaining 13 (21.7%) died of diseases other than GISTs. The cumulative incidence of PD logarithmically increased, and PD continued even after 10 years of treatment. PD HR decreased over time to reach the lowest value at 9.6 years after the initiation of treatment (HR 0.00027; 95% CI 0.00007-0.00174) and after that formed a small peak at 13 years (HR 0.00144; 95% CI 0.00043-0.00436).
conclusionsImatinib therapy showed high clinical efficacy in terms of long-term survival in GIST patients. However, patients undergoing imatinib therapy were at continuous risk of PD even after the 10-year treatment. Long-term treatment and follow-up beyond 10 years are necessary for unresectable and metastatic GIST patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39343814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.