ArticleScientific reports2024
Development and validation of a novel liquid-liquid phase separation gene signature for bladder cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Condensatopathies as a mechanistic framework for disease and integrated theranostic intervention.Theranostics · 2026Review
- A novel efferocytosis-related gene signature for predicting prognosis and therapeutic response in bladder cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bladder carcinoma (BLCA) represents a common urinary tract malignancy, characterized by aggressive behavior and high recurrence rates. The biological response regulation during tumor proliferation and metastasis is intimately associated with liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). For the purpose of enhancing early detection and treatment, this study employed transcriptomic data to examine the prognostic implications of LLPS-associated genes and formulate a predictive model. Clinical and transcriptomic data of bladder cancer patients were sourced from the GEO and TCGA databases. This study applied a clustering algorithm using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) to classify samples, which were systematically compared based on their liquid-liquid phase separation characteristics. Prognostic models were developed using multivariate Cox regression and the Least Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithm to establish risk formulas for nine genes. The gene signature's validity was tested across the entire TCGA cohort (406 cases), the TCGA testing cohort (120 cases), and the external validation dataset GSE13507. The predictive accuracy of the signature system was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Kaplan-Meier curves. Additionally, decision curve analysis incorporating clinicopathological parameters and the genetic signature was employed to predict individual survival. This study identified two distinct molecular subtypes, C1 and C2. Patients with the C1 subtype exhibited significantly better prognoses than those with the C2 subtype. Low-risk group patients consistently showed superior prognoses compared to high-risk groups across the entire TCGA, GEO, and TCGA training cohorts. Furthermore, the LLPS-related gene model demonstrated prognostic value independent of other clinical traits. This study identifies LLPS-associated gene clusters and establishes an independent, accurate prognostic model for BLCA. The model holds potential for clinical application in BLCA prognosis assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.