Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39343790›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Field validation of effects of species and flock size on echoes in avian radar surveys.

Taito Kamata, Takahiro Sato, Koki Tateishi, Kayo Koumura, Yoichi Kawaguchi, Tsuneo Sekijima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Taito KamataFaculty of Agriculture, Niigata University, 8050 Ikarashi 2-Nocho, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan. kamata@agr.niigata-u.ac.jp.
Takahiro SatoGraduate School of Technology, Industrial, and Social Sciences, Tokushima University, 2-1 Minamijosanjima, Tokushima, 770-8506, Japan.
Koki TateishiGraduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata, 951-8585, Japan.
Kayo KoumuraFaculty of Agriculture, Niigata University, 8050 Ikarashi 2-Nocho, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan.
Yoichi KawaguchiGraduate School of Technology, Industrial, and Social Sciences, Tokushima University, 2-1 Minamijosanjima, Tokushima, 770-8506, Japan.
Tsuneo SekijimaFaculty of Agriculture, Niigata University, 8050 Ikarashi 2-Nocho, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radar is a powerful technology for surveys of avian movements. Validating the accuracy of radar detection is essential when establishing quantitative criteria for tracking bird trajectories and counting bird flocks. This study clarifies the positional and biological factors influencing the probability of detection (POD) and echo size on X-band marine radar. The bird trajectory for validation was obtained by ornithodolite at the same time as the radar scan. Distance was found to have a negative effect on POD and echo size, while elevation angle positively affected POD. Body mass and flock size positively affected POD and echo size. In predicting detection performance, the survey distance required to achieve 50% POD was 750 m or less for Grey-faced Buzzard, the lightest target species, but up to 1800 m for a pair of Bewick's Swan. Our study provides survey and analysis procedures that allow for efficient validation using ornithodolites. Then, we identify the range settings that should be considered for target species and contribute to establishing criteria for quantitative radar bird surveys.

Indexed as

BirdsRadarAnimalsFlight, Animal

Identifiers

PMID39343790
PMCPMC11439958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.