ArticleScientific reports2024
Effects of white matter hyperintensity burden on functional outcome after mild versus moderate-to-severe ischemic stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Brain Frailty in Stroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signatures of White Matter Hyperintensities: Mechanistic Insights Into Pathobiological Heterogeneity.Journal of stroke · 2026Review
- White matter hyperintensity burden and infarct volume predict functional outcomes in anterior choroidal artery stroke: a multimodal MRI study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- White matter hyperintensity burden in young patent foramen ovale patients and its correlation with migraine.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- A binational study of the association between white matter hyperintensities and functional outcome in stroke patients.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Impact of cerebral small vessel disease burden and systemic clinical phenotypes on short-term neurological outcomes after acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is uncertain whether the prognostic power of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) on post-stroke outcomes is modulated as a function of initial neurological severity, a critical determinant of outcome after stroke. This multi-center MRI study tested if higher WMH quintiles were associated with 3-month poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3) for mild versus moderate-to-severe ischemic stroke. Mild and moderate-to-severe stroke were defined as admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores of 1-4 and ≥ 5, respectively. Mean age of the enrolled patients (n = 8918) was 67.2 ± 12.6 years and 60.1% male. The association between WMH quintiles and poor functional outcome was modified by stroke severity (p-for-interaction = 0.008). In mild stroke (n = 4994), WMH quintiles associated with the 3-month outcome in a dose-dependent manner for the 2nd to 5th quintile versus the 1st quintile, with adjusted-odds-ratios (aOR [95% confidence interval]) being 1.29 [0.96-1.73], 1.37 [1.02-1.82], 1.60 [1.19-2.13], and 1.89 [1.41-2.53], respectively. In moderate-to-severe stroke (n = 3924), however, there seemed to be a threshold effect: only the highest versus the lowest WMH quintile was significantly associated with poor functional outcome (aOR 1.69 [1.29-2.21]). WMH burden aggravates 3-month functional outcome after mild stroke, but has a lesser modulatory effect for moderate-to-severe stroke, likely due to saturation effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.