Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39343352›Full record

ArticleRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP2024

Optimizing the detection of N-nitrosamine mutagenicity in the Ames test.

Robert H Heflich, Michelle E Bishop, Roberta A Mittelstaedt, Jian Yan, Sharon K Guerrero, Audrey M Sims, Kamela Mitchell, Nyosha Moore, Xilin Li, Nan Mei and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Complex versus simpleScience advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of a DNA damage assay system using stable human hepatocytes.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Robert H HeflichU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA. Electronic address: robert.heflich@fda.hhs.gov.
Michelle E BishopU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA.
Roberta A MittelstaedtU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA.
Jian YanU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA.
Sharon K GuerreroU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA.
Audrey M SimsU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA.
Kamela MitchellU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA.
Nyosha MooreU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA.
Xilin LiU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA.
Nan MeiU.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, USA.
Rosalie K ElespuruU.S Food and Drug Administration, USA.
Sruthi T KingU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Generic Drugs, USA.
David A KeireU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, USA.
Naomi L KruhlakU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Translational Sciences, USA.
Robert T DorsamU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Generic Drugs, USA.
Andre S RawU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, USA.
Karen L Davis BrunoU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of New Drugs, USA.
Timothy J McGovernU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of New Drugs, USA.
Aisar H AtrakchiU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of New Drugs, USA.

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately determining the mutagenicity of small-molecule N-nitrosamine drug impurities and nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs) is critical to identifying mutagenic and cancer hazards. In the current study we have evaluated several approaches for enhancing assay sensitivity for evaluating the mutagenicity of N-nitrosamines in the bacterial reverse mutagenicity (Ames) test. Preincubation assays were conducted using five activation conditions: no exogenous metabolic activation and metabolic activation mixes employing both 10% and 30% liver S9 from hamsters and rats pretreated with inducers of enzymatic activity. In addition, preincubations were conducted for both 60 min and 30 min. These test variables were evaluated by testing 12 small-molecule N-nitrosamines and 17 NDSRIs for mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537, and Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA (pKM101). Eighteen of the 29 N-nitrosamine test substances tested positive under one or more of the testing conditions and all 18 positives could be detected by using tester strains TA1535 and WP2 uvrA (pKM101), preincubations of 30 min, and S9 mixes containing 30% hamster liver S9. In general, the conditions under which NDSRIs were mutagenic were similar to those found for small-molecule N-nitrosamines.

Indexed as

Mutagenicity TestsMutagensNitrosaminesSalmonella typhimuriumActivation, MetabolicAnimalsCricetinaeDrug ContaminationEscherichia coliLiverMaleRatsMutagensNitrosaminesAcceptable intake limitAmes testCarcinogenic potency categorization approachDrug impuritiesHamster liver S9Mutagenicity dose-response rankingNitrosamine drug substance-related impuritiesPreincubationRat liver S9Small-molecule N-Nitrosamines

Identifiers

PMID39343352
PMCPMC12395388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.