ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024
Applications of ancestral sequence reconstruction for understanding the evolution of plant specialized metabolism.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resolving competing evolutionary histories in joint ancestral state reconstruction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Convergence and parallelism in the evolution of plant metabolism.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Resurrection and characterization of ancestral xylose transporters enhance the capability of xylose uptake in the mixed sugar co-fermentation of Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
- Uncertainty in joint Ancestral State Reconstruction: Improving accuracy and biological interpretability of ancestral state prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Current and future perspectives for enhancing our understanding of the evolution of plant metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of enzymes in modern-day plants have documented the diversity of metabolic activities retained by species today but only provide limited insight into how those properties evolved. Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) is an approach that provides statistical estimates of ancient plant enzyme sequences which can then be resurrected to test hypotheses about the evolution of catalytic activities and pathway assembly. Here, I review the insights that have been obtained using ASR to study plant metabolism and highlight important methodological aspects. Overall, studies of resurrected plant enzymes show that (i) exaptation is widespread such that even low or undetectable levels of ancestral activity with a substrate can later become the apparent primary activity of descendant enzymes, (ii) intramolecular epistasis may or may not limit evolutionary paths towards catalytic or substrate preference switches, and (iii) ancient pathway flux often differs from modern-day metabolic networks. These and other insights gained from ASR would not have been possible using only modern-day sequences. Future ASR studies characterizing entire ancestral metabolic networks as well as those that link ancient structures with enzymatic properties should continue to provide novel insights into how the chemical diversity of plants evolved. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of plant metabolism'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.