Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39343029›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Evolution of plant metabolism: the state-of-the-art.

Alisdair R Fernie, Sophie de Vries, Jan de Vries

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Algal origins of core land plant stress response subnetworks.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Phylogenomic and synteny analysis of BAHD and SCP/SCPL gene families reveal their evolutionary histories in plant specialized metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Current and future perspectives for enhancing our understanding of the evolution of plant metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alisdair R FernieMax-Planck-Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1 , Potsdam-Golm 14476, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-335X
Sophie de VriesDepartment of Applied Bioinformatics, University of Goettingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Goldschmidtstr. 1 , Goettingen 37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5267-8935
Jan de VriesDepartment of Applied Bioinformatics, University of Goettingen, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Goldschmidtstr. 1 , Goettingen 37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3507-5195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immense chemical diversity is one of the hallmark features of plants. This chemo-diversity is mainly underpinned by a highly complex and biodiverse biochemical machinery. Plant metabolic enzymes originated and were inherited from their eukaryotic and prokaryotic ancestors and further diversified by the unprecedentedly high rates of gene duplication and functionalization experienced in land plants. Unlike prokaryotic microbes, which display frequent horizontal gene transfer events and multiple inputs of energy and organic carbon, land plants predominantly rely on organic carbon generated from CO

Indexed as

PlantsBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularMetabolic Networks and Pathwaysevolutionphytohormoneprimary metabolismsecondary metabolism

Identifiers

PMID39343029
PMCPMC11449224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.