Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39343028›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Phylogenomic and synteny analysis of BAHD and SCP/SCPL gene families reveal their evolutionary histories in plant specialized metabolism.

Thomas Naake, John C D'Auria, Alisdair R Fernie, Federico Scossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Current and future perspectives for enhancing our understanding of the evolution of plant metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Phylogenomic and synteny analysis of BAHD and SCP/SCPL gene families reveal their evolutionary histories in plant specialized metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas NaakeEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7917-5580
John C D'AuriaLeibniz Institute of Crop Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4865-3938
Alisdair R FernieMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-335X
Federico ScossaMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-1679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant chemical diversity is largely owing to a number of enzymes which catalyse reactions involved in the assembly, and in the subsequent chemical modifications, of the core structures of major classes of plant specialized metabolites. One such reaction is acylation. With this in mind, to study the deep evolutionary history of BAHD and the serine-carboxypeptidase-like (SCPL) acyltransferase genes, we assembled phylogenomic synteny networks based on a large-scale inference analysis of orthologues across whole-genome sequences of 126 species spanning Stramenopiles and Archaeplastida, including

Indexed as

CarboxypeptidasesEvolution, MolecularMultigene FamilyPhylogenySyntenyAcyltransferasesArabidopsisGenome, PlantPlant ProteinsSolanum lycopersicumZea maysAcyltransferasesCarboxypeptidasesPlant Proteinsserine carboxypeptidaseacyltransferaseBAHDphylogenomicsSCPLsecondary metabolismsynteny

Identifiers

PMID39343028
PMCPMC11449225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.