Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342804›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2024

Association of mixed exposure to microplastics with sperm dysfunction: a multi-site study in China.

Chen Zhang, Guanghui Zhang, Kuan Sun, Jingchao Ren, Jiaming Zhou, Xuan Liu, Fenglong Lin, Huijun Yang, Jinhu Cao, Lin Nie and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Health impacts of micro- and nanoplastics in humans: systematic review of in vivo evidence.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Chen ZhangInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China. Electronic address: chenzhang_ired@fudan.edu.cn.
Guanghui ZhangDepartment of Environmental Health, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Kuan SunDepartment of Fetal Medicine & Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 201204, China.
Jingchao RenSchool of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China.
Jiaming ZhouInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xuan LiuDepartment of Environmental Health, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Fenglong LinHenan International Collaborative Laboratory for Health Effects and Intervention of Air Pollution, School of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, China.
Huijun YangClinical Medical Research Center for Women and Children Diseases, Key Laboratory of Birth Regulation and Control Technology of National Health Commission of China, Shandong Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Jinan 250001, China.
Jinhu CaoHenan International Collaborative Laboratory for Health Effects and Intervention of Air Pollution, School of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, China.
Lin NieReproductive Medicine Centre, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Xiaogan, Xiaogan 432000, China.
Pingyang ZhangReproductive Medicine Centre, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Xiaogan, Xiaogan 432000, China.
Lin ZhangClinical Medical Research Center for Women and Children Diseases, Key Laboratory of Birth Regulation and Control Technology of National Health Commission of China, Shandong Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Jinan 250001, China.
Ziqian WangHenan International Collaborative Laboratory for Health Effects and Intervention of Air Pollution, School of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, China.
Haibin GuoReproductive Center, Henan Provincial Peoples Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Xianhua LinInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shuyin DuanSchool of Public Health and Health Management, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250001, China. Electronic address: duanshuyin@sdfmu.edu.cn.
Jia CaoDepartment of Environmental Health, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China. Electronic address: caojia1962@126.com.
Hefeng HuangInstitute of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education), Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Institute of Medical Genetics and Development, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China. Electronic address: huanghefg@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroplastics are environmental pollutants detected in various human organs and tissues. These particles originate from multiple sources including the degradation of larger plastic items and the intentional inclusion in consumer goods. Potential risks for human health resulting from microplastics exposure have also been reported. However, the distribution in the male reproductive system and its effect remains largely unknown. This study aims to investigate the presence of multiple microplastics in human semen and urine and their association with sperm quality in a multi-site study across China.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study involving 113 male participants from three regions in China. Semen and urine samples were collected and analysed using Raman microscopy to detect eight types of microplastics: polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene (PE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). Semen quality parameters, including total sperm count, concentration, motility, and morphology, were assessed. Statistical analyses, including single and multi-variable models, were used to evaluate the relationship between microplastic exposure and semen quality, with a focus on PTFE, after adjusting confounding factors of age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol drinking, and sites.

findingsMicroplastics were detected in all semen and urine samples, with participants typically exposed to 3-5 different types. The detection rates of PS, PP and PE were the highest. Notably, PTFE exposure was significantly associated with decreased semen quality. Participants exposed to PTFE showed reductions in total sperm count [188.90 ± 163.71 vs. 207.67 ± 132.36 million, p = 0.091], sperm concentration [52.13 ± 47.47 vs. 58.32 ± 37.26 million/mL, p = 0.041], and progressive motility [40.29% ± 19.06 vs. 34.11% ± 17.02, p = 0.083]. The multi-linear regression analysis indicated that each additional type of microplastic exposure was associated with a significant decrease in total sperm number [β = -15.4 (95% CI: -25.6, -5.2)], sperm concentration [β = -7.2 (95% CI: -12.4, -2.0)], and progressive motility [β = -8.3 (95% CI: -13.5, -3.1)]. Latent category analysis further refined these groups by types of microplastic exposure, highlighting specific types more strongly associated with decreased semen quality (OR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.8, 6.9, p < 0.001). The nomogram can be used to assess the risk of sperm damage by combining the type of microplastic exposure in urine with age and BMI.

interpretationOur findings highlight the potential reproductive health risks posed by microplastic contamination, particularly PTFE, a non-stick pan coating material, and raise concerns about the potential of urine testing as an indicator of male reproductive microplastic exposure. Future research is warranted to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying the adverse effects of microplastics on male fertility and cross-generational effects.

fundingThis study was funded by the Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family planning (20224Y0085), Open Fund Project of Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (YKY-KF202202), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2019-I2M-5-064), Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Gynecological Diseases (22MC1940200), Shanghai Urogenital System Diseases Research Centre (2022ZZ01012), Key Discipline Construction Project (2023-2025) of Three-Year Initiative Plan for Strengthening Public Health System Construction in Shanghai (GWVI-11.1-35, GWVI-11.2-YQ29) and Shanghai Frontiers Science Research Base of Reproduction and Development.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureMicroplasticsSpermatozoaAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental PollutantsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSemenSemen AnalysisSperm CountSperm MotilityEnvironmental PollutantsMicroplasticsMale healthMicroplasticsPTFERaman spectrumSemen quality

Identifiers

PMID39342804
PMCPMC11663775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.