ArticleEBioMedicine2024
Association of mixed exposure to microplastics with sperm dysfunction: a multi-site study in China.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of microplastics on the mice gut microbiome: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Plastamination, Human Health, and Countries' Cultural Orientation: An Exploratory Study on Prevention Strategies and Organizational Policies and Practices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Phthalates as the silent saboteurs of male fertility via changes in semen quality: a systematic review.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Pooled it
- Health impacts of micro- and nanoplastics in humans: systematic review of in vivo evidence.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026Pooled it
- Bioinspired zinc-doped carbon dots protect against polystyrene microplastic-induced spermatogenic dysfunction through Nrf2 activation and cuproptosis suppression.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- The impact of microplastics on the human reproductive system: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- [Microplastic and male urogenital health: current evidence and clinical implications].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Current Evidence Linking Microplastic Exposure and Reproductive Cancers.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Emerging-Pollutant Toxicity in Human Reproduction: From Xenobiotic Exposure to Fertility Impairment and Reproductive Carcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Swimming in Plastamination: Polylactic Acid (PLA) Nanoplastics Affect Bull Sperm Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Possible Role of Gut Microbiota in Polypropylene Microplastics-Induced Immunity and Reproductive Dysfunction in Mice.Toxics · 2026Article
- Dietary microplastic exposure and lip-oral cavity cancer: a global ecological analysis with pre-specified spatial econometric sensitivity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Small particles, large questions: unravelling the toxicity and potential health risks of PET micro-/nanoplastics.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2026Review
- Article
- Hydrogel-mEV-SKAP2: A promising biotherapeutic product for male fertility decline.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
- Harmful Effects of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Human Body Systems: A Systematic Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Combined exposure to titanium nanoparticles and nanoplastics damages the male reproductive system and sperm activity.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: How environmental exposures compromise male fertility and clinical Outlook.Current research in toxicology · 2026Review
- Impacts of environmental stressors on fertility and fecundity across taxa, with implications for planetary health.NPJ emerging contaminants · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroplastics are environmental pollutants detected in various human organs and tissues. These particles originate from multiple sources including the degradation of larger plastic items and the intentional inclusion in consumer goods. Potential risks for human health resulting from microplastics exposure have also been reported. However, the distribution in the male reproductive system and its effect remains largely unknown. This study aims to investigate the presence of multiple microplastics in human semen and urine and their association with sperm quality in a multi-site study across China.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study involving 113 male participants from three regions in China. Semen and urine samples were collected and analysed using Raman microscopy to detect eight types of microplastics: polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP), polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene (PE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). Semen quality parameters, including total sperm count, concentration, motility, and morphology, were assessed. Statistical analyses, including single and multi-variable models, were used to evaluate the relationship between microplastic exposure and semen quality, with a focus on PTFE, after adjusting confounding factors of age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol drinking, and sites.
findingsMicroplastics were detected in all semen and urine samples, with participants typically exposed to 3-5 different types. The detection rates of PS, PP and PE were the highest. Notably, PTFE exposure was significantly associated with decreased semen quality. Participants exposed to PTFE showed reductions in total sperm count [188.90 ± 163.71 vs. 207.67 ± 132.36 million, p = 0.091], sperm concentration [52.13 ± 47.47 vs. 58.32 ± 37.26 million/mL, p = 0.041], and progressive motility [40.29% ± 19.06 vs. 34.11% ± 17.02, p = 0.083]. The multi-linear regression analysis indicated that each additional type of microplastic exposure was associated with a significant decrease in total sperm number [β = -15.4 (95% CI: -25.6, -5.2)], sperm concentration [β = -7.2 (95% CI: -12.4, -2.0)], and progressive motility [β = -8.3 (95% CI: -13.5, -3.1)]. Latent category analysis further refined these groups by types of microplastic exposure, highlighting specific types more strongly associated with decreased semen quality (OR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.8, 6.9, p < 0.001). The nomogram can be used to assess the risk of sperm damage by combining the type of microplastic exposure in urine with age and BMI.
interpretationOur findings highlight the potential reproductive health risks posed by microplastic contamination, particularly PTFE, a non-stick pan coating material, and raise concerns about the potential of urine testing as an indicator of male reproductive microplastic exposure. Future research is warranted to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying the adverse effects of microplastics on male fertility and cross-generational effects.
fundingThis study was funded by the Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family planning (20224Y0085), Open Fund Project of Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (YKY-KF202202), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2019-I2M-5-064), Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Gynecological Diseases (22MC1940200), Shanghai Urogenital System Diseases Research Centre (2022ZZ01012), Key Discipline Construction Project (2023-2025) of Three-Year Initiative Plan for Strengthening Public Health System Construction in Shanghai (GWVI-11.1-35, GWVI-11.2-YQ29) and Shanghai Frontiers Science Research Base of Reproduction and Development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.