Trial reportAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
Comparison between Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization Alone in BCLC Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pilot Study.
Trial report in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- External beam radiation for HCC: Ready for incorporation into guidelines?JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBoth Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Trans-arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) are now being widely used to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and can improve tumor local control rates. We aimed at evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of combining SBRT and TACE in comparison to TACE alone in unresectable HCC.
methods42 unresectable Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B HCC Child Pugh (CP) A patients were randomized to receive either: TACE alone (Arm A) or TACE followed by SBRT (Arm B). Dose prescribed was 40Gy in 5consecutive daily fractions over 1 week . We compared the local control (LC), Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity between the two arms.
results22 patients were in arm A versus 20 patients in arm B with median follow up 20 months starting recruitment from April 2021 till January 2023. Both LC, PFS were significantly better in Arm B. Complete remission (CR) rate was 54.5% and 75% in Arm A and B, respectively. Median PFS was 16 months in Arm B compared to 11 months in Arm A (p =0.003). Median OS was not reached in both arms. Both arms had comparable toxicities.
conclusionAdding SBRT to TACE in advanced HCC, is safe and feasible with better efficacy in terms of LC and PFS with comparable side effects, in comparison to TACE alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.